The NC General Assembly created a new commission to develop the rules for how hydraulic drilling of natural gas (fracking) can proceed in North Carolina and it gave most the seats to the mining and energy industry. That’s bad enough, but it turns out Speaker Thom Tillis filled a seat reserved for an environmentalist with a Lee County man whose company is buying up mineral rights for exploration. A revealing video investigation by WRAL-TV captures just how sneaky the whole affair is – the investigative report begins less than a minute into a half-hour show on ethical conflicts at the new NC Mining and Energy Commission. The fracking industry has a disturbing record of being ethically challenged.
Link-of-the-Day Category
Democracy North Carolina’s Executive Director Bob Hall periodically posts commentary and links of interest about one of our core issue areas. Review his posts below or click here to automatically subscribe to our Link-of-The-Day feed via email and other options.
You are welcome to submit comments to this moderated blog. Please treat others with respect, avoid partisan rhetoric, and help us provide a fact-based discussion of issues related to North Carolina’s political landscape. Thank you.
LOD: Harrassing Voters
Monday, August 13th, 2012
A Raleigh-based group called Voter Integrity Project is forcing election officials to spend hundreds of hours researching the status of voters the group claims are not alive or not citizens. VIP’s first mass action challenged the registrations of over 500 voters whose names matched people who indicated they were not citizens in their response to a summons to jury duty in Wake County. After extensive research, the state and county election boards have narrowed the list of possible problems to about 8 voters; many of the rest were not citizens at the time they were called to jury service but became naturalized citizens before they registered to vote. VIP is not satisfied; they’re appealing their claims to superior court. But, as reporter Scott Mooneyham indicates, the challenge shows that current registration procedures actually work well. (Meanwhile, a new law that Democracy NC helped pass will stop the Division of Motor Vehicles from including non-citizen legal residents in the lists it sends to clerks of court for potential jury duty, which will improve the integrity of those lists and save everyone time and money.) VIP has also challenged the registration of hundreds of voters it claims match the names of dead people in several counties, including Wake, Alamance, Halifax and Moore. There likely are names that should be removed, especially because of the time lag and other glitches in how election boards are notified about deaths – although nowhere near as many names as VIP claims. The group could play a better role if it took a cooperative approach with officials instead of pursuing a mission to damage the credibility of the election process as a prelude to pushing again for a harsh voter ID law.
LOD: Early Voting Shouldn’t Be Partisan
Thursday, August 9th, 2012
Early Voting is very popular in North Carolina and the evidence shows it doesn’t inherently favor Democrats or Republicans (see reports here and here). But in the current hyper-partisan environment, disputes over the location and hours of Early Voting sites are too often turning into a power struggle instead of a rational discussion about sensible options. Sunday voting is becoming more controversial in this context, but the data show that Sunday afternoons are the most intensive hours of voting in nearly every county that has offered this option. People who work fixed schedules or who have limited access to transportation need opportunities to vote on weekends and evenings, and we need to offer them if we want North Carolina to climb out of its typical ranking among the bottom 15 states for voter turnout (2008 was the exception, thanks to Early Voting and Same-Day Registration). Most counties are finalizing their Early Voting plans this week or have already set the schedule. When the Democratic and Republican members of the local board of elections can’t agree, alternative plans are reviewed by the State Board of Elections, which has historically favored providing voters more opportunities. Will that perspective change if Republicans gain the majority of seats on the State Board by virtue of winning the governorship?
LOD: Growing Latino Vote in NC
Wednesday, August 8th, 2012
A report released today reveals that North Carolina has 115,000 registered Latino voters or nearly 25,000 more than the official count at the State Board of Elections (which only began asking voters their ethnicity in 2002). That’s a 35% increase over the number in October 2008. In addition, the report says another 100,000 unregistered Latino citizens could be signed up to vote by November. The report by Democracy North Carolina and a trio of Latino organizations also describes key characteristics of the Latino electorate and strategies for engaging them in the political process. For example, it points out that 62% of Latino registered voters are ages 18-40, compared to 34% of white and 43% of black registered voters. No racial or ethnic group has a higher proportion of Unaffiliated voters (37%), which suggests that neither party should take the growing Latino vote for granted. The report pinpoints the counties with the most Hispanics, in absolute numbers and as a percent of the county’s population. Contrary to the stereotype of Hispanics being single men from Mexico who enter the US illegally and migrant from job to job, the report notes that 58% of the Latinos in North Carolina are citizens, 39% originate from a country other than Mexico, and 47% are women. A one-page version of the report is available for download here.
LOD: Super PACs & Über-Fat Cats
Thursday, August 2nd, 2012
Here’s another report about the tiny number of über-fat cats bankrolling the Super PACs. The Washington Post reports: “Just 47 people account for more than half (57.1 percent) of the $230 million raised by super PACs from individual donors, according to the study by U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) and Demos, two liberal research and advocacy organizations. Just over 1,000 donors giving $10,000 or more were responsible for 94 percent of the money raised.” The libertarian Cato Institute would be happy – let people do what they want with their money, no regulation needed. That may be a fine theory for an ivory tower elitist, but it doesn’t work too well in real life, for hamburgers or elections. Fueled by the greedy few, we’re now on our way to experience a record-shattering $5.8 billion federal election cycle, says the Center for Responsive Politics. You can hear the Cato Institute closer to home, at Quail Ridge Books in Raleigh. John Samples from Cato will join Press Millen, a more level-header soul and local attorney, in a discussion of the meaning and impact of the Citizens United decision as part of the bookstore’s town meeting series. The free event, no reservation needed, is August 13 at 7:30 PM.
LOD: High Road, Low Road
Monday, July 30th, 2012
Here are two NC stories of groups setting out to exert power – one taking the hard road of community organizing and grassroots democracy, the other using their big-money connections to buy an election. The first story describes how and why Stokes County neighbors came together to wage an impressive campaign against the prospect of natural gas fracking in the backyards. Many of them had won an earlier Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) fight and they knew the importance of persistence, facts, emotion, strategy, and public support. They eventually forced their all-Republican county commission to oppose fracking and then won over their conservative state legislator, who bucked his GOP leaders by voting to uphold Gov. Perdue’s veto of the fracking legislation – truly remarkable. There are many lessons in this story, down to the last part about the group’s new interest in local electoral politics. Meanwhile, the other story is about a new Super PAC setting out to pick the winner of the NC Supreme Court election for you. The group is led by the curious team of former state Republican chair Tom Fetzer (who was burned by a Democrat-backed independent group in the 2006 judicial election) and Democratic former Chief Justice Burley Mitchell. There are lessons in this story, too, plus this lingering question: Will the candidate benefiting from this Super PAC (Justice Paul Newby) publicly scold these powerbrokers for undermining a fair election?
LOD: Inside View of Outside Money
Friday, July 27th, 2012
Because the State Board of Elections is starved for funds, the public gets a poor view of how money flows into our elections: Who is giving and spending what for whose benefit? While other states have searchable databases of donors, the backlog for processing campaign disclosure reports in NC is measured in years. (See, for example, this Democracy NC report on the backlog.) The problem is even worse when it comes to tracking the millions spent on elections by outside groups that are supposedly not coordinated with a candidate. Thankfully, here comes the Institute for Southern Studies with what it calls “North Carolina’s first searchable database of election-year spending by independent groups in state races. . . . FollowNCMoney.org gathers all reports on TV ads, mailers and other independent expenditures by outside groups in North Carolina, and places them in an easy-to-use searchable and sortable database. Users can sort the information by the name of the group spending the money, the date of the expenditure, the political race where it appears and the affected candidate.” ISS emphasizes that the site is “a beta release,” undergoing revisions and updates “largely because of gaps and inconsistencies in government reports.” Check it out, play around with the data, turn in your feedback! Thanks ISS/Facing South!
LOD: WhichWayNC.com
Thursday, July 26th, 2012
Students at the UNC School of Journalism and Mass Communication have created an interactive flow chart of the money in NC political campaigns with annotated descriptions of key terms. Visualize rivers of money. They’ve also just posted a series of articles about NC campaign finances on their WhichWayNC website and blog. Did you know that the two leading candidates for governor have already spent more than what an average North Carolinian would earn in 164 years? Another part of the website dissects and grades political advertisements: Good, bad and weird. Some parts of the website need updates, as well as fact-checking and corrections, but hey, nobody should think journalists are perfect. It’s a site that should become more useful as the fall semester and campaign season move into high gear.
LOD: Off With Runoffs?
Wednesday, July 25th, 2012
Only 3.6% of registered North Carolina voters cast ballots in the runoff election on July 17. That’s about one-tenth of the already miserable turnout rate for the May primary – 34.7%. FairVote’s analysis of the runoff notes that more North Carolinians believe in fairies and vampires than voted in July. The losers in the primary received far more votes than were cast in the runoff, indicating it’s a fairly useless tool for building party consensus behind a nominee. FairVote also notes that editorial writers and NC organizations across the political spectrum think Instant Runoff Voting would be a viable alternative to the expensive, low-turnout method now used to pick a party’s nominee for positions like Commissioner of Insurance or Secretary of State.
LOD: The Missing 200,000
Friday, July 20th, 2012
Facing South this week includes a report from the Sentencing Project about the number of citizens in each state who are disenfranchised because of a felony conviction. North Carolina bars people who are serving a felony sentence from voting, but they automatically regain their voting rights as soon as they finish their sentence, including probation or parole. The chart shows 82,400 North Carolinians without voting rights because of a felony conviction. The number excluded soars to 341,800 in Tennessee, 451,500 in Virginia, and 1,541,600 in Florida because of those states’ harsher laws that withhold voting rights even after a person finishes his or her sentence. Democracy North Carolina recently held a press conference in Charlotte to spread awareness about the automatic restoration of voting rights in our state. One former felon featured in this TV report is now the mayor of Marshville, Franklin Deese. “I want my life to be a testament and an example for all people,” he says. “If this guy can go from being an inmate to now being the mayor, surely I can go from wherever I am to where I need to be.” More awareness of NC’s law is needed to overcome word on the street that once you’ve been locked up, you’re locked out of voting; the myth is not true, but it contributes to the large gender gap among voters in North Carolina. While women make up 53.5% of white voters in NC, they make up 58% of African-American voters! If black men registered at the same rate as black women, another 200,000 black men would be registered today, a 35% increase over the current 575,000 in the state.
LOD: The Rogue LaRoque
Thursday, July 19th, 2012
A federal grand jury has indicted state legislator Rep. Stephen LaRoque (R-Kinston) on a variety of charges related to misusing federal funds received by two nonprofit lending outfits he created “to alleviate poverty and increase economic activity and employment in rural communities.” The charges follow an investigative series by NC Policy Watch and include stealing $300,000 from the federal government, failing to report substantial income to the IRS, and using criminally derived money to purchase jewelry, an ice rink, a home and other gifts for his wife and daughters. The indictment also says LaRoque funneled federal anti-poverty funds into his political campaign and loans for himself and various friends. Yesterday, House Speaker Thom Tillis forwarded the indictment to the legislative ethics committee and encouraged LaRoque, who serves as Tillis’ Rules Committee Co-Chair, to resign.
LOD: Lightning Bolts In Our Spirit
Tuesday, July 17th, 2012
Check out this video of slam master Bluz of Charlotte rapping on more than you hear at first listen; it begins 1 minute into the video, after Robert Dawkin’s introduction. Thanks to the Democracy Summer team in Charlotte for hosting the “Shade of Democracy” event – a “fusion of art and activism.”
LOD: Sunshine Blocker
Friday, July 13th, 2012
A new bill in the US Senate to increase disclosure of campaign money again uses the title DISCLOSE Act, but Democratic sponsors have watered it down from last year’s version in the hopes of winning enough Republican support for passage. One report says the Senate bill, S. 3369 “does not prohibit campaign spending by foreign entities, TARP recipients, and government contractors. The bill also does not require companies to report campaign spending to shareholders, or require lobbyists to report campaign spending. But it would require reporting for each $10,000 in spending, and would subject companies, labor unions and super PACs to this rule. However, it would not require parties, candidate committees or charitable organizations to file these reports.” What’s the chance the slimmed-down bill can win a cloture vote later this month? Remarkably, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) has just announced he’ll stick with Republican leader Sen. Mitch McConnell and oppose the legislation, even though he has stepped up his criticism of the Citizens United decision in recent months, calling it “uninformed, arrogant, naïve.” The Public Campaign Action Fund criticized McCain for putting partisan loyalty above the public interest and observed, “Until there’s a political price to pay for opposing reform and policies like DISCLOSE, politicians will look for any excuse to maintain the status quo.”